Skip to main content
Launching the open-source gateway

GPT-6.1 Terra vs Kimi K3.1 Pro

SpecGPT-6.1 TerraKimi K3.1 Pro
Respan Index68.9 (#9)71.2 (#5)
Blended price per 1M$1$3.6
Context window1.1M1.0M
Input / output per 1M$0.5 / $2.5$1.8 / $9
Max output128K1.0M
Inputtext, visiontext, vision, video
Released2026-10-262026-10-23

Respan Index by category

Each category is scored 0 to 100, and how far ahead the winner is. Leads under a point are close to even.

CategoryGPT-6.1 TerraKimi K3.1 Pro
Coding57.9 GPT-6.1 Terra67.7 Kimi K3.1 Pro
Agents77.0 GPT-6.1 Terra69.7 Kimi K3.1 Pro
Reasoning83.0 GPT-6.1 Terra83.7* Kimi K3.1 Pro
Knowledge & language57.4 GPT-6.1 Terra71.5* Kimi K3.1 Pro
Human preference57.9 GPT-6.1 Terra58.5 Kimi K3.1 Pro

* Estimated: no published scores in that category. How the Respan Index works

Benchmarks both report

Kimi K3.1 Pro leads on 3 of the 4 benchmarks both report. Higher is better. Each score links to where it was published.

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 TerraKimi K3.1 Pro
LMArena Agent (LMArena)0.10570.0596
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)16731695
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)49.5%63.6%
Terminal-Bench 4.050.3%65.7%

FAQ

Is GPT-6.1 Terra better than Kimi K3.1 Pro?

Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 71.2 on the Respan Index (#5), ahead of GPT-6.1 Terra at 68.9 (#9). Kimi K3.1 Pro leads on 3 of the 4 benchmarks both report.

Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Terra or Kimi K3.1 Pro?

GPT-6.1 Terra lists at $0.5 input and $2.5 output per 1M tokens; Kimi K3.1 Pro at $1.8 and $9. GPT-6.1 Terra is 3.6x cheaper per token at list price.

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-6.1 Terra accepts 1.1M tokens and Kimi K3.1 Pro 1.0M tokens.

Compare other models

vs

Built for AI agents.
Break less.
Ship more.