Skip to main content
Launching the open-source gateway

Kimi K2 vs Qwen3.5 4B

SpecKimi K2Qwen3.5 4B
Respan Index17.3 (#136)17.3 (#136)
Blended price per 1M$1$0.048
Context window128K262K
Input / output per 1M$0.57 / $2.3$0.04 / $0.07
Max output--
Inputtexttext, vision, video
Released2025-07-112026-03-02

Respan Index by category

Each category is scored 0 to 100, and how far ahead the winner is. Leads under a point are close to even.

CategoryKimi K2Qwen3.5 4B
Coding5.3 Kimi K21.6 Qwen3.5 4B
Agents12.3* Kimi K218.7 Qwen3.5 4B
Reasoning18.5 Kimi K220.1 Qwen3.5 4B
Knowledge & language11.6 Kimi K29.1 Qwen3.5 4B
Human preference47.2 Kimi K241.6* Qwen3.5 4B

* Estimated: no published scores in that category. How the Respan Index works

Benchmarks both report

Kimi K2 leads on 2 of the 2 benchmarks both report. Higher is better. Each score links to where it was published.

BenchmarkKimi K2Qwen3.5 4B
MMLU-Pro81.1%79.1%
MMLU-Redux92.7%88.8%

FAQ

Is Kimi K2 better than Qwen3.5 4B?

Kimi K2 and Qwen3.5 4B tie on the Respan Index at 17.3. Kimi K2 leads on 2 of the 2 benchmarks both report.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2 or Qwen3.5 4B?

Kimi K2 lists at $0.57 input and $2.3 output per 1M tokens; Qwen3.5 4B at $0.04 and $0.07. Qwen3.5 4B is 21x cheaper per token at list price.

Which has the larger context window?

Kimi K2 accepts 128K tokens and Qwen3.5 4B 262K tokens.

Compare other models

vs

Built for AI agents.
Break less.
Ship more.