Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Wonder Full
| Spec | Claude Fable 5.1 | Muse Wonder Full |
|---|---|---|
| Respan Index | 70.4 (#6) | 70.9 (#5) |
| Blended price per 1M | $10 | - |
| Context window | 1M | - |
| Input / output per 1M | $5 / $25 | - |
| Max output | 128K | - |
| Input | text, vision | text, vision, video, audio |
| Released | 2026-09-01 | 2026-10-12 |
Respan Index by category
Each category is scored 0 to 100, and how far ahead the winner is. Leads under a point are close to even.
| Category | Claude Fable 5.1 | Muse Wonder Full |
|---|---|---|
| Coding | 64.3 Claude Fable 5.1 | 62.9 Muse Wonder Full |
| Agents | 73.8 Claude Fable 5.1 | 74.1 Muse Wonder Full |
| Reasoning | 78.9 Claude Fable 5.1 | 82.8* Muse Wonder Full |
| Knowledge & language | 71.4 Claude Fable 5.1 | 70.5* Muse Wonder Full |
| Human preference | 59.8 Claude Fable 5.1 | 59.3 Muse Wonder Full |
* Estimated: no published scores in that category. How the Respan Index works
Benchmarks both report
Claude Fable 5.1 leads on 2 of the 3 benchmarks both report. Higher is better. Each score links to where it was published.
FAQ
Is Claude Fable 5.1 better than Muse Wonder Full?
Muse Wonder Full scores 70.9 on the Respan Index (#5), ahead of Claude Fable 5.1 at 70.4 (#6). Claude Fable 5.1 leads on 2 of the 3 benchmarks both report.