MiMo-V2-Flash vs Qwen3.6 27B
| Spec | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Respan Index | 23.1 (#102) | 22.8 (#104) |
| Blended price per 1M | $0.151 | $0.688 |
| Context window | 262K | 262K |
| Input / output per 1M | $0.108 / $0.28 | $0.25 / $2 |
| Max output | - | - |
| Input | text | text, vision |
| Released | 2025-12-16 | 2026-04-21 |
Respan Index by category
Each category is scored 0 to 100, and how far ahead the winner is. Leads under a point are close to even.
| Category | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Coding | 6.9 MiMo-V2-Flash | 6.6 Qwen3.6 27B |
| Agents | 21.8* MiMo-V2-Flash | 23.5* Qwen3.6 27B |
| Reasoning | 27.3 MiMo-V2-Flash | 26.1 Qwen3.6 27B |
| Knowledge & language | 19.6 MiMo-V2-Flash | 17.4 Qwen3.6 27B |
| Human preference | 47.5 MiMo-V2-Flash | 46.7* Qwen3.6 27B |
* Estimated: no published scores in that category. How the Respan Index works
Benchmarks both report
Qwen3.6 27B leads on 3 of the 3 benchmarks both report. Higher is better. Each score links to where it was published.
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.7% | 87.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | 84.9% | 86.2% |
| SWE-bench Verified | 73.4% | 77.2% |
FAQ
Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than Qwen3.6 27B?
MiMo-V2-Flash scores 23.1 on the Respan Index (#102), ahead of Qwen3.6 27B at 22.8 (#104). Qwen3.6 27B leads on 3 of the 3 benchmarks both report.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Flash or Qwen3.6 27B?
MiMo-V2-Flash lists at $0.108 input and $0.28 output per 1M tokens; Qwen3.6 27B at $0.25 and $2. MiMo-V2-Flash is 4.6x cheaper per token at list price.
Which has the larger context window?
Both accept 262K tokens of context.